Hey
Yesterday we got a NAS-backup appliance with deduplication etc. to
test, and it can export its shares as either CIFS or NFS. When
writing to a CIFS share there were no errors, when writing to a
default mounted NFS share however bacula was unable to restore from
any volume due to block positioning errors.
After reading up on block size stuff and NFS I tried writing and
restoring from the same NFS share, but mounted with the "rsize=32768,wsize=32768"
options. This worked like a charm!
Now I'm wondering if I was just lucky, or if this should always
work? Is there someone with experience with bacula and NFS shares
that has a somewhat "optimal" setting for the NFS mount, and perhaps
for the bacula storage config?
What I'm wondering about most is if this will always work correctly
with the default block size of 64,512 bacula uses...
Kind regards,
Jeremy
**** DISCLAIMER ****
http://www.schaubroeck.be/maildisclaimer.htm
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
Learn about the latest advances in developing for the
BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more.
See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 _______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
