Martin Aherron wrote:
> Ran across an interesting deadlock situation that I can't explain.
> This is a configuration that has been working reliably for months.
I see this fairly regularly (about once a month) too.
I have no idea why bacula demands that a tape which is already mounted
in one drive be mounted in another. Some better sanity checking wouldn't
go amiss. :-)
(In my setup any pool can be mounted on any drive. This is most likely
the default setup for most installations)
> excerpt from status command:
>
> Device status:
> Autochanger "Overland Neo" with devices:
> "ULTRIUM-TD1-1" (/dev/nvdrive_1)
> "ULTRIUM-TD1-2" (/dev/nvdrive_2)
> "ULTRIUM-TD1-3" (/dev/nvdrive_3)
> "ULTRIUM-TD1-4" (/dev/nvdrive_4)
> Device "ULTRIUM-TD1-1" (/dev/nvdrive_1) is mounted with:
> Volume: Tape_20_52
> Pool: Pool_1
> Media type: Ultrium-1
> Slot 9 is loaded in drive 0.
> Total Bytes=15,525,328,896 Blocks=240,657 Bytes/block=64,512
> Positioned at File=97 Block=0
> Device "ULTRIUM-TD1-2" (/dev/nvdrive_2) is mounted with:
> Volume: CTape_50_10
> Pool: Pool_2
> Media type: Ultrium-1
> Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume "CTape_50_9",
> Pool: Pool_2
> Media type: Ultrium-1
> Slot 83 is loaded in drive 1.
> Total Bytes Read=64,512 Blocks Read=1 Bytes/block=64,512
> Positioned at File=0 Block=0
> Device "ULTRIUM-TD1-3" (/dev/nvdrive_3) is mounted with:
> Volume: CTape_50_9
> Pool: Pool_3
> Media type: Ultrium-1
> Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume "CTape_50_10",
> Pool: Pool_3
> Media type: Ultrium-1
> Slot 10 is loaded in drive 2.
> Total Bytes Read=64,512 Blocks Read=1 Bytes/block=64,512
> Positioned at File=0 Block=0
>
>
> Running Jobs:
> Writing: Incremental Backup job Enterprise JobId=3401 Volume="CTape_50_9"
> pool="Pool_2" device="ULTRIUM-TD1-2" (/dev/nvdrive_2)
> spooling=0 despooling=0 despool_wait=0
> Files=0 Bytes=0 Bytes/sec=0
> FDReadSeqNo=6 in_msg=6 out_msg=4 fd=13
> Writing: Full Backup job SalesDB JobId=3402 Volume="CTape_50_10"
> pool="Pool_3" device="ULTRIUM-TD1-3" (/dev/nvdrive_3)
> spooling=0 despooling=0 despool_wait=0
> Files=0 Bytes=0 Bytes/sec=0
> FDReadSeqNo=6 in_msg=6 out_msg=4 fd=12
> ====
>
>
> excerpt from list volumes:
>
>
> Pool: Pool_2
> +---------+------------+-----------+---------+---------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+
>
>
> | mediaid | volumename | volstatus | enabled | volbytes | volfiles
> | volretention | recycle | slot | inchanger | mediatype |
> lastwritten |
> +---------+------------+-----------+---------+---------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+
>
>
> | 135 | CTape_50_9 | Append | 1 | 9,490,618,368 | 37
> | 5,184,000 | 1 | 83 | 1 | Ultrium-1 | 2011-09-07
> 02:06:12 |
> +---------+------------+-----------+---------+---------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+
>
>
> Pool: Pool_3
> +---------+-------------+-----------+---------+----------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+
>
>
> | mediaid | volumename | volstatus | enabled | volbytes |
> volfiles | volretention | recycle | slot | inchanger | mediatype |
> lastwritten |
> +---------+-------------+-----------+---------+----------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+
>
>
> | 136 | CTape_50_10 | Append | 1 | 38,421,218,304 |
> 41 | 5,184,000 | 1 | 10 | 1 | Ultrium-1 | 2011-09-07
> 02:06:17 |
> +---------+-------------+-----------+---------+----------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+
>
>
>
>
> Notice that two devices assigned to two different jobs using two
> different pools are blocking each other.
> Anyone have any insight?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Why Cloud-Based Security and Archiving Make Sense
> Osterman Research conducted this study that outlines how and why cloud
> computing security and archiving is rapidly being adopted across the IT
> space for its ease of implementation, lower cost, and increased
> reliability. Learn more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51425301/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|