>>>>> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:34:47 +0100, Graham Sparks said:
> It's a real shame that the pruning takes effect across pools. If it only
> affected volumes in the same pool as the job, and didn't happen if the job
> failed (I think the latter's the case anyway), that would be great for cases
> where the client may not always be accessible.
I think this is fixed in the development branch (for the next release).
In 5.0.x, it prunes everything related to the client that was used in the job.
__Martin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|