On 2011-07-12 05:38, Martin Simmons wrote:
> Yes, that looks mostly normal.
>
> I would report that log output as a bug at bugs.bacula.org.
>
> I'm a little surprised that it specifically asked for the volume named FA0016
> though:
>
>    2011-07-10 03SD-loki JobId 6: Please mount Volume "FA0016" or label a new 
> one for:
>
> but you then issued the label command for that volume.
>
> Was FA0016 in the database already?  If not, how did bacula predict the name?

Yes, I pre-populate the database with the range of tapes for each pool 
since I already have the bar coded tapes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users