Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Full (upgraded from Incremental)

2010-06-11 10:15:23
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Full (upgraded from Incremental)
From: Carlo Filippetto <carlo.filippetto AT gmail DOT com>
To: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:12:20 +0200
No change..
I think that the reason is the second one you have write.. This is a
recend machine, I think that I done the first FULL bck in the "daily
pool", that have 15 days of retention..


2010/6/10 John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Carlo Filippetto
> <carlo.filippetto AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>> May be that bacula is able to understand the dimension of the backup
>> and change the level based on it?
>>
>> I found that the dimension of the share of this server is gone from 20
>> gb to 200 gb in a day.. so I can think that bacula upgrade the
>> incremental to full to use less space next time??
>>
>>
>
> Did you change the fileset since the last successful full backup or
> purge the volume that the last successful full backup was on?
>
> John
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>