>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:59:45 -0400, Paul Mather said:
> 
> I would like to continue to use this volume for backups, as it is well under
> the 5 GB maximum volume bytes set in the pool definition.  Is this an
> unrealistic expectation for a bscan-recovered catalogue, or is there some
> simple way to get this volume recognised as appendable again?  (Is the
> expectation after bscan to start with a new volume?)

No, bscan doesn't set VolBytes accurately.  You could try to modify the value
using an SQL command.


> Is Bacula expected to act gracefully in the face of the loss/corruption of
> the catalogue?

Yes, but the recommended way to recover it is from a catalog backup.  That
doesn't help much for Sqlite -> PostgreSQL migration though, unless you can
mungle the Sqlite dump to match what PostgreSQL needs.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users