Re: [Bacula-users] low despooling speeds when parallelism is increased
2010-06-02 07:53:23
Athanasios Douitsis schrieb:
> Tuning it down to 3+3 (from the original 6+6) seems to alleviate but not
> solve the problem completely. I totaly agree with your suggestion, from
> this point onwards it seems to be a case of finding a spooling setup
> with enough I/O oomph.
>
> One question however, in your setup you have limited your concurrent
> jobs to 3 as in 3 jobs overall or as in 3 jobs per drive (9 overall)?
3 jobs overall.
We don't have too many jobs, but the jobs that are running are rather
large (7-10 TB).
Ralf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|