Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Max Run Time exceede with 0s run time!

2010-04-12 04:55:24
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Max Run Time exceede with 0s run time!
From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer AT omnilan DOT de>
To: Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:52:21 +0200
Harald Schmalzbauer schrieb am 08.04.2010 20:18 (localtime):
Am 08.04.2010 14:20, schrieb Matija Nalis:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 12:46:25PM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:

Absurdly canceled job 47:
Fatal error: Max run time exceeded. Job canceled.
Scheduled time:         04-Apr-2010 21:01:03
 Start time:             04-Apr-2010 21:39:41
 End time:               04-Apr-2010 21:39:41
 Elapsed time:           0 secs
...
Here's my conf regarding max times:
Max Start Delay = 14400 # 4h to wait after scheduled start
Max Run Time = 1800 # Half an hour to run after beeing really started
Incremental Max Run Time = 900 # 15 Minutes for incrementals after beeing started
Max Run Sched Time = 36000 # 10 hours to wait to start job as planned
Max Wait Time = 7200 # 2h to wait for resources after job really started
Which version of bacula is that ? There were bugs not too far ago
where 'Max Wait Time' wrongly acted like 'Max Run Time'; maybe it had
similar problems with other related directives too.

I'm running 5.0.1.

First job took longer than 30 minutes, so it was canceled. Second job
took 9 minutes, so start time of third job is 39minutes after scheduled.
There's no other time limit which could fit, "Max Wait Time" is 2 hours.

Hello,

this weekend the same thing happened again.
I intentionally set the "Max Run Time" to 30 mins, but it is not working. It hoses all other subsequent jobs but the one following.
Again to visualize my timetable:

at 21:00h:
startjob1 - startjob2 - startjob3 - startjob4 - startjob5
----------------------------------------------------------
runing       waiting     waiting     waiting     waiting
----------------------------------------------------------
> 30 mins
canceled     running     waiting     waiting     waiting
----------------------------------------------------------
    -        finisehd    canceled
             ok (8min)  (0s runtime) waiting     waiting
----------------------------------------------------------
    -           -           -        canceled
                                   (0s runtime)  waiting
----------------------------------------------------------
    -           -           -            -      canceled
                                              (0s runtime)


Why do job 3-5 get cancelled with 0s runtime?
How can I file a bug report?

Another thing:
The canceled (due to runtime longer than 30mins) job reports 0 Bytes written, but in fact it should have been writing for 30 minutes. Which seems to be tha case if I compare Volume Bytes:
At last volume usage: 162,598,409,235 (162.5 GB)
Canceled Job reports:
  Elapsed time:           30 mins 22 secs
  Priority:               10
  FD Files Written:       0
  SD Files Written:       0
  FD Bytes Written:       0 (0 B)
  SD Bytes Written:       0 (0 B)
  Rate:                   0.0 KB/s
  Software Compression:   None
  VSS:                    no
  Encryption:             no
  Accurate:               no
  Volume name(s):         MonthA
  Volume Session Id:      73
  Volume Session Time:    1270146159
  Last Volume Bytes:      174,597,640,742 (174.5 GB)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  Non-fatal FD errors:    0
  SD Errors:              0
  FD termination status:  Error
  SD termination status:  Running
  Termination:            Backup Canceled

So it has written 12GB. Are the reports only valid for correctly terminated jobs? I think even for canceled or other error termination it should report as many correct values as possible.

Thanks,

-Harry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>