On 03/24/10 05:56, Thomas Wakefield wrote:
> Phil-
> Your exactly right in what you are thinking.  Your diagram is correct,
> the server has both connections.  Both interfaces run on separate subnets.
> 
> But right now, all the traffic runs over ethernet.  Which i have proven
> with a netstat, only the ethernet shows any connections, no connections
> are done over infiniband.

In that case, I would believe that you have a routing problem, and the
route to the ethernet segment has been assigned a lower (better) routing
metric than the infiniband subnet.  What is the output, on your Bacula
server, of 'netstat -rn'?

You *are* of course defining infiniband clients by their addresses on
the infiniband subnet, right?

-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
         Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users