On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Stephen Thompson wrote:

> shows a consistent load average on Solaris of between 0-1 (occasional
> peaks above) and a consistent load average on Linux of 2-4 (occasional
> peaks above, though seldom below unless "literally" idle).
> [...]
> To say the least, this is rather disappointing as a Linux fan.
> Does anyone have an explanation or remediation for this?

Since you have the same name as me, I'll reply :)

What you are probably seeing is the fact that I believe that the load 
average is not measuring the same thing on Solaris and Linux. On Linux, it 
includes processes in uninterruptible sleep (eg disk I/O), and on Solaris 
it does not. It is reasonable for the value to be higher on Linux. Whether 
or not either method of calculation is more reasonable is of course a 
different question.

Steve 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Steve Thompson E-mail:  smt AT vgersoft DOT com Voyager Software LLC Web: 
http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com 39 Smugglers Path VSW Support: support AT 
vgersoft DOT com Ithaca, NY 14850
   "186,300 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience,
a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. 
Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users