On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Paul Binkley <paul.binkley AT ois DOT com> 
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I hope someone can help. I have been using Bacula for a couple of months now
> running 2.4 on the director and all client daemons, and 3.0 for the storage
> daemon (my mistake). This has been working fine. The 3.0 file daemon isn't
> compatible with the 2.4 director, so I need to downgrade.
>
> It seems to be much more trouble to upgrade all the clients and the
> director, so downgrading the sd seems to be the best option. Does anyone
> have experience with this? What kind of trouble will I be getting into?
>

You did not say what OS your 3.0 client was on. Also a 3.0 director
can talk to a 2.4.X client. At home I have this setup.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users