[Bacula-users] backup for a new machine way too small


Hi,

I just added a new machine to my backup set and tried to run a full
backup. The machine is basically configured like any other, in terms of
what Bacula has to say, but the "compression ratio" was _much_ too good
to be true (~250MB instead of 3 GB, most of it being images). Bacula
claimed that the backup ran OK.

My backups go to disk, with one job = one file, roughly named
"<hostname>_<level>_<timestam>".

I didn't manage to find out what files are actually in a given backup
file, like outlined above. It would be sufficient for me to be able to
use something like 'restore' from the ufsdump package, but I didn't
find my way around 'bconsole' to achieve something similar. I also
tried 'bat', but when I clicked on what I thought was the FileSet
explorer (?), it simply hung after some 15-20 minutes (?), with
three windows in solid grey (no buttons, diagrams, nothing).

These are two Debian/Lenny machines with bacula 2.4.4.


Kind regards,
--Toni++


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users