Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula performance so slow ???

2009-10-13 09:01:07
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula performance so slow ???
From: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
To: Klaus Troeger <klaus AT linuxstar DOT de>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:55:25 +0100 (BST)
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Klaus Troeger wrote:

> LTO-3 drive (equipped with "only" LTO-2 tapes, but ....)
>
> Physical drive performance is 28sec for 1 Gigabyte, so ~35MB/sec
>
> [root@denbvsbcks1 disk1]# dd if=/dev/zero of=swapfile bs=1024
> count=1000000
> 1000000+0 records in
> 1000000+0 records out
> 1024000000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 79.907 s, 12.8 MB/s
> [root@denbvsbcks1 disk1]# date;tar cvf /dev/nst0 swapfile ;date
> Fri Oct  2 06:00:22 CEST 2009
> swapfile
> Fri Oct  2 06:00:50 CEST 2009
>
> So, it's not the physical hardware, it has to be Bacula itself.

You fed it 1Gb of nulls and it only ran at 35Mb/s???

Try feeding it random (uncompressable) data please.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>