Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] unreliable file timestamps?

2009-08-06 09:04:04
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] unreliable file timestamps?
From: Mike Eggleston <mikeegg1 AT mac DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:01:11 -0500
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009, Mike Eggleston might have said:

> Morning,
> 
> I am moving some data off a linux box to a NetGear ReadyNAS NV+. It seems
> like the time stamps on files on the ReadyNAS are unreliable. Is there a
> setting in the configuration for the client to perform a hash-based (or
> other) analysis of a file (comparing the current hash with the previous
> hash for example) to determine if the file has changed and should be
> backed up?
> 
> I'm searching for such a setting and have not found it yet.
> 
> Failing finding a setting I'll write a File setting in the File Set for
> these (three so far) shares from the NAS.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Mike

I found the setting inside the File Set definitions.

Thanks.

Mike

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>