Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and CentOS 5.2 Deficiencies

2008-12-29 20:01:00
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and CentOS 5.2 Deficiencies
From: Frank Sweetser <fs AT WPI DOT EDU>
To: Richard Petty <Richard.Petty AT freescale DOT com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:55:02 -0500
Richard Petty wrote:
> I'm attempting to get Bacula 2.4.3 working on a fresh install of  
> CentOS 5.2 (up to date) for evaluation. Been at it all day.
> 
> After replacing CentOS' MySQL with MySQL-Sun's official version and  
> installing bacula-mtx, the bacula-mysql RPM installed without any  
> trouble.
> 
> I thought the GUI would be nice so I tried to install a Fedora RPM,  
> hoping I would get lucky:

As you've found, fedora is quite beyond CentOS/RHEL in terms of library
versions.  You're better off grabbing the SRPM and compiling it on the system
you want to use it on.

-- 
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu  |  For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Senior Network Engineer   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
    GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4  E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>