Hi,
After running ldconfig it's fine now.
Thanks Frank :)
-----Wiadomość oryginalna-----
Od: Frank Sweetser [mailto:fs AT WPI DOT EDU]
Wysłano: 2 listopada 2008 01:58
Do: Tomasz Westrych
DW: Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Temat: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Beta 2.5.16 - after installation problem
Tomasz Westrych wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> What do you get when you run
>> ldd /sbin/bacula-fd
>
> I get :
>
> libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x0000020000031000)
> libbacfind.so.1 => not found
> libbacpy.so.1 => not found
> libbaccfg.so.1 => not found
> libbac.so.1 => not found
Okay, good - that's consistent with the error message you were seeing, at
least. Try this:
- double check that the library files really are in /usr/lib, and that
there isn't anything that would prevent them from being read (ownership,
permissions, selinux label).
- run 'ldconfig -v'. This should update the library cache used by ldd,
and the bacula libraries should be listed in the output.
- try running the program again.
--
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Senior Network Engineer | is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4 E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wymysl wierszyk, wygraj cyfrowke!
Sprawdz >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1f5a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
