Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] beckup remote client

2008-10-14 18:42:36
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] beckup remote client
From: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: sublayer <subbustrato AT gmail DOT com>, bacula-users <Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:41:01 -0400
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> 
wrote:
>>> This is not the direction I mean. I assume that the director can
>>> access the remote client. But can the remote client access the
>>> storage? Is there a firewall that prevents the remote client fd from
>>> initiating its own connection to the storage daemon @ port 9103?
>>>
>>> John
>> ok, sorry.
>> Also on the pc that contain the storage i haven't firewalls active, do
>> you now a way that allow me to verify immediately the possibility for
>> the client to reach the storage?
>>
> On the client
>
> telnet to ipaddress port of the storage
>
> port=9103
>
> If you get connection refused then there is a network problem or the
> storage is not started. If not then you can connect.
>
> Also depending on your configuration it may be a dns problem. Are you
> using the external ipaddress of the storage in Address= part of
> bacula-dir.conf for the storage resource or is this a FQDN
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FQDN)? If it is a FQDN can the client
> resolve this?
>

Also make sure that 127.0.0.1 or localhost are not used in your bacula
config files.

John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>