Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] tapes are not reliable?

2008-09-29 08:54:27
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] tapes are not reliable?
From: Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu AT realss DOT com>
To: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:49:40 +0800
John Drescher wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu AT realss DOT com> 
> wrote:
>   
>> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>>     
>>> Well, DDS is often called WORN - Write Once Read Never :-)
>>>
>>>       
>> Hi. Your text looks very good to complete this web page:
>> http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/Supported_Tape_Drives.html
>>
>>     
> There is a bacula wiki which you can add your own experience.
>
> http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=hardware_results
>
>   
I don't mean my own information I mean the following are valuable for
newbies (they are from Arno)

> My own experience is that LTO, AIT, DLT, SDLT and QIC tape 
> technologies are quite robust.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>