On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Keith Sudbury wrote:

> I see, well if I wanted to compile my own, how would I go about doing
> this? I would have to completely remove the RPM then build them from
> source? Or build my own RPMs?

Better to build your own rpm, the 2.4.1 srpm is a good starting point.

2.4.2 rpms will appear on the website in due course (usually 4-10 days) so
if you can wait, then it will be easier.


>
> Thanks
>
> Alan Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Keith Sudbury wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> If you have read my previous post you will see that I have been having
> >> some issues with Bacula seg faulting during a restore... I currently
> >> have 2.0.3-10 installed via the EPEL repo on a CentOS 5 box, I am
> >> wanting to upgrade to 2.4.1-1 from the bacula SF page
> >> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727&package_id=213714
> >>
> >
> > There's a known restore crash in 2.4.1, wait for 2.4.2 RPMs or compile
> > your own.
> >
> >
> >> Is this likely to cause me any problems? Regarding databases etc? will I
> >> have to re label the tapes again??
> >>
> >
> > No database modifications are required between 2.0 and 2.4.
> >
> > In general, if database changes are required then upgrade scripts are
> > provided.
> >
> > AB
> >
> >
>
>
>

-- 
Sending anything by unencrypted email is the internet equivalent of writing on 
the back of a post
card that anyone might be able to see.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users