Re: [Bacula-users] Catalogs using ORACLE instead of MySQL

Subject:	Re: [Bacula-users] Catalogs using ORACLE instead of MySQL
From:	Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
To:	James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:42:48 -0400

On Jul 10, 2008, at 8:22 AM, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:

> Hi,
>
> How easy would it be to get bacula to talk to ORACLE instead of MySQL?

It can't be that hard.  I wrote the PostgreSQL extension.

>
> If an application already uses ORACLE, it would be nice to use ORACLE
> for the catalog, instead of installing a second SQL database engine
> like MySQL.

If you are using Oracle, you'd be better off with PostgreSQL, not MySQL.

-- 
Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/






-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula says it is doing incremental backup but does full backup., John Drescher

Next by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Vbackup feature, Blake Dunlap

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Catalogs using ORACLE instead of MySQL, João Henrique Freitas

Next by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Catalogs using ORACLE instead of MySQL, James Courtier-Dutton

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]