Re: [Bacula-users] bacula on fedora 9 very slow

I believe the disk backend has been rewrite in f9 (Gvfs instead of gnome-vfs in f8), and it 's quite experimental actually. Maybe that's the reason.

Noran

2008/6/6 Hemant Shah <hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com>:

Folks,

Has anyone used bacula 2.2.8 on Fedora 9?

I was testing bacula on a fedora 8. I had to re-intall Linux so I decided on installing Fedora 9 instead. bacula version is the same as before and was compiled using same parameters. The configuration also same. Now my backup is running very slow. I ran a test backup of one of the systems. Under fedora 8 it took 4 minutes to backup 4.8GB, on fedora 9 it has been running for 1.5 hours and has not yet completed.

Hemant Shah
E-mail: hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users