Re: [Bacula-users] Backing up iSCSI targets, VMWare - With Bacula
2008-04-10 14:44:42
I'm happy using ESXpress www.esxpress.com to get the actual vm's. There
is a free version if you want to just try it out.
Dan Trainor wrote:
>
> Hi, all –
>
> I’m faced with a pretty unique situation that I can’t quite think of a
> way in which Bacula can effectively back up exactly what I’m trying to
> back up.
>
> The ultimate goal is to be able to run incremental, differential, and
> full backups.
>
> Playing around with some performance numbers and we’ve found at least
> a 10x speed improvement when using an iSCSI target from our VMWare
> host as a raw device for the VM, over a file-based device for the VM
> which would reside on that same VM host. Although that’s great, I’m
> still not comfortable doing that given the fact that we can’t reliably
> back up the data.
>
> I’m looking for an effective way to back up any and all of these VMs,
> and the problem resides with the method by which we are actually using
> the target. The original idea was to use LVM to take snapshots and
> thereby manage incremental and differential backups. However, VMWare –
> using that iSCSI target as a raw device – would leave that device as
> type LVM, but rather, whatever filesystem that the host uses. Even if
> that wasn’t an issue, it would still defeat the purpose of using iSCSI
> devices, since VMWare would then have to be forced to create a
> file-based filesystem for the guest. Catch-22, you know? To make
> things even better, we’re going to have quite a few Windows VMs, too.
>
> I’d rather also not use bacula-fd from within the vmware guest, as I
> don’t want to double-up on the iSCSI path usage – however, this may be
> our only choice. If I can simply backup from the raw device and also
> find a way to do incremental and differential backups off of that,
> that would be quite ideal.
>
> It looks like right now the only way to actually get a snapshot of
> that device (rather, vmware disk) is to use some proprietary software
> by VMWare. Although I’m not completely opposed to that, I’d like to
> stick with Bacula, iSCSI, and some good old fashioned hackery.
>
> Thanks
>
> -dant
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|