Ah, ok. I would run a Full backup (now considered "Filled"). That's the safest move prior to removing 134. The most recent backup is always Filled, but were talking about important data so I don't see a problem with doing on more Full (Filled) backup to ensure safety.
Craig - anything wrong with my logic here?
Cheers,
mph
On 2017-05-21 20:29, Alexey Safonov wrote:
Thanks for quick reply.
but as i understan in V4 full backup in last folder. My question is related to bug in 4.1.2 (that is now fixed). But because of that bug i have regular backup 133 , abnormal backup 134 (it's huge in size) and again normal backup 135
i need to really cleanup my NFS storage. So if i delete 134 it will not help? is it correct?
I would strongly suggest the use of BackupPC_backupDelete -n 134 to properly remove the backup. It should be fine to remove. You'll lose whatever changes occurred between 133 and 134.
Cheers,
mph
On 2017-05-21 19:36, Alexey Safonov wrote:
Hi, All
I'm usinv V4 backuppc. is it safe to delete one intermediate backup? for example we have in /pc/litspc123 dirs 133 135 and 135
is it safe to delete backup 134 directly from nfs?
Alex
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot