On 16.05.16 12:13, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
> If You can, it would be nice if You could bring the repo up-to-date with 
> current CVS.
> After that we can decide if to open a new project for v4 (rationale being it 
> really
> changes a lot and even backend repository structure is not compatible anymore;
> nice nickname might be BackupNG) or simply do a branch and populate it with
> tarball contents.
>
On the other hand v3 and v4 have many identical or very similar code parts. 
Having them as a branches of the same project would simplify synchronous 
changes. I think we will have to support v3 for significant period of time. 
There will be a lot of identical bug fixes. Even minor features would be added 
to both branches.

> I send this message in CC: to the list; whoever is interested in helping out 
> *managing* this (David, Juergen, who else?)
> please speak up. I would like to keep this list short, but not *too* short.
I'am interested https://github.com/moisseev

> Should we move this discussion to the BackupPC-devel list or is it better to 
> keep it here to get a wider audience?.
>
I think for the moment we need a wider audience as possible.
FUY Both lists somehow mirrored to Backup Central Forums as well.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/