Re: [BackupPC-users] Using Amazon AWS S3/Glacier with BackupPC
2016-03-17 19:53:14
Marcel Meckel <mailinglist+backuppc-users <at> foobar0815.de> writes:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Amazon offers amongst other services one named S3* (Simple Storage
> Service, moderate
> price with low latency) and Glacier* (extremely cheap storage, retrieval
> can take hours,
> perfect for backups only needed when disaster strikes).
>
> With the correct config rules in place, files uploaded to S3 can be
> moved to Glacier
> automatically, e.g. when the file's age is >= 14 days.
Hi Marcel - I'd suggest you store files in S3 Infrequent Access instead of
Glacier. S3IA costs 1.2 cents/GB/mo - not much more than .7 cents/GB/mo for
Glacier, and is much more flexible. There's also Google Nearline for 1
cent/GB/mo and Backblaze B2 for .5 cents/GB/mo.
Glacier is not very flexible storage. I did a writeup about it here:
http://www.hashbackup.com/technical/glacier-eol
Jim (author of HashBackup)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|