BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] fulls consistently align

2015-04-20 14:35:55
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] fulls consistently align
From: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <chrome AT real-time DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:34:07 -0400
On 04/20 12:26 , gregrwm wrote:
> iiuc backuppc currently has no feature to disperse the likelihood that
> several or many full backups will consistently be aligned to occur on
> the same day.  indeed it's quite likely that many full backups will
> consistently align on the same day, eg if they were added on the same
> day and follow the same schedule.


I'll throw this idea out at the same time in case some clever soul can
figure out how to work them together:

It would be nice to be able to specify that certain hosts should not be
backed up at the same time. For instance, if I have 30 virtual machines all
served from the same NAS, only one of them should be backed up at a time. By
the same token, there may be hosts which have low bandwidth (such as if
they're offsite) and several may be backed up simultaneously with no
problems. Perhaps this could be done via groups.

-- 
Carl Soderstrom
Systems Administrator
Real-Time Enterprises
www.real-time.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>