On 17/09/2012 17:01, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Mark Coetser<mark AT tux-edo.co DOT za>  
> wrote:
>
>> Surely disk io would affect normal rsync as well? Normal rsync and even
>> nfs get normal transfer speeds its only rsync within backuppc that is slow.
>>
>
> Backuppc uses its own rsync implementation in perl on the server side
> so it will probably not match the native version's speed.  Is this the
> first or 2nd full run?  On the first it will have to compress and
> create the pool hash file links.  On the 2nd it will read/uncompress
> everything for block-checksum verification.  If you have enabled
> checksum caching, fulls after the 2nd will not have to read/uncompress
> unchanged files on the server side.
>

Its the first full run but its taking forever to complete, it was 
running for nearly 3 days!


Thank you,

Mark Adrian Coetser

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/