I'm also assuming this means it'll be harder to access the data outside of 
BackupPC itself as well.


Craig Barratt wrote:
> Trey writes:
> 
> 
> > I should probably look back at the archives for this, but "no 
> > hardlinks"?   I thought that was the way the pool was able to save disk 
> > space -- an essential feature (at least for us).  Is this going to be 
> > implemented in some other way?
> > 
> 
> Yes, pooling continues to work.  Reference counting is done at the
> application level (using a simple data base) rather than file system
> level (using hardlinks).  This will make the BackupPC data store a
> lot easier to copy and backup.
> 
> Craig
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by 
> 
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users < at > lists.sourceforge.net
> List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by Saturn2888 AT gmail DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/