BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] backing up over WAN

2010-07-07 10:59:52
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] backing up over WAN
From: Kameleon <kameleon25 AT gmail DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:57:39 -0500
Yes, this is what we do with 4 of our sites that are off our fiber
ring. Although 2 have the bandwidth to complete the initial backup the
other 2 don't. So we just take the backup server on site and let it
get an initial full. As Les stated, after the initial full it will
work the way you intend.

Donny B.

On 7/7/10, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Udo Rader wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we need to setup a "reasonable" backup solution for one of our
>> customers, consisting of a HQ office and two branches. The most
>> important requirement is off-site backup. Backup volume will be
>> approximately 50 GB per office for a full backup, meaning 150GB in total.
>>
>> So far, we have used backuppc for almost any backup solution, but this
>> time I am not 100% sure because of the "WAN" side of life.
>>
>> What I am wondering is if it was possible to retrieve files from the
>> clients more intelligently:
>>
>> If I understand BackupPC's pooling concept correctly, pooling takes
>> place after the file has been transferred to the server and is compared
>> to other files in the pool.
>>
>> Yet what I have in mind would be "don't transfer a file if we already
>> have it in the pool", thus drastically reducing the amount of data
>> transferred over the net.
>>
>> IIRC, the rsync protocol per se should just allow that, but I am unsure
>> if BackupPC utilizes it at that level.
>>
>> So is this "transfer minimization" doable with BackupPC?
>
> Rsync compares only against the last full backup tree on the same host,
> transferring the differences.  Once you get started it will work the way you
> want, but each new machine will transfer everything on the first run and if
> the
> same file is added on many machines, it will be copied separately from each,
> then merged in the pool.   One thing you might do to to help get started
> would
> be to take the server on-site to each office for the first full run, then
> move
> to its permanent location.   Or if you have the bandwidth, perhaps you can
> do
> the initial run over a weekend.
>
> --
>    Les Mikesell
>     lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>