Re: [BackupPC-users] Concrete proposal for feature extension for pooling
2010-03-04 02:52:33
Les writes:
> I think this will need some sort of atomic-operation reference count
> manager at the heart of things so you don't do those lookups except as a
> repair step.
Yes.
> Will there be a way to disable the de-dup operations completely in the
> case where the underlying filesystem does it at the block level? I'd
> expect such filesystems to become common and stable within the life of
> this backuppc version.
Good point. I think I would keep the file-level de-dup since I
think it would be pretty efficient.
But turning off compression should allow the underlying filesystem
to then do a good job on block-level de-dup.
Craig
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|