Re: [BackupPC-users] catch up hump

James Ward wrote:
> My busiest BackupPC server fell very behind before I did some tuning (thanks 
> for your help!) after I upgraded it from 2.x to 3.x due to disk contention 
> between the nightly admin jobs and backups (which I had running 24x7).  I 
> think I have it performing similarly to 2.x now, but it just can't seem to 
> catch up.  It's taking 7-8 days to make full backups of all the clients, and 
> since the full backup period is 6.97, it just keeps making full backups.  
> Should I temporarily or even permanently increase the full backup period to 
> help it get to the point that it can do incrementals?

That would depend on the pattern of data change.  If a lot of files are 
changing the incrementals will keep getting bigger.  If there's not a 
lot of activity, it won't hurt to have longer full intervals.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/