On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org> wrote:
dan wrote at about 14:00:43 -0600 on Sunday, August 30, 2009:
> I personally think that using ssh compression is the better method. I say
> this because running rsync through ssh encrypts the data and compresses
> it(optionally). Unless you plan to run rsync in the clear then the built in
> compression isnt needed.
ssh adds overhead with its encryption. Of course, I was referring to
the case when you are comfortable running rsync/rsyncd in the clear.
to reduce the encryption overhead you could do ssh -c blowfish which is much faster (10x) than the default cypher of 3des.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
