Jon Craig wrote:
> Lastly, we wouldn't be having a discusion about replicating the
> backuppc server if backuppc wasn't as stable and robust as it is.
> BackupPC must first and foremost be a reliable and trustworthy
> repository of backup data.  It having the ability to replicate itself
> for "DR" purposes comes second.
>
>
>   
Perhaps - but a very close second. Backuppc is very stable and robust. 
But, disasters do happen. I have had my grits saved at least twice by 
having a remote backup of the backup server (remember Katrina and New 
Orleans?)  and I am very nervous about using a backup technology that 
cannot be replicated properly without physical access.

Peter

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/