Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature or bug? Full backup (mis)numbered as level 1
2008-12-12 14:18:34
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote at about 13:26:47 -0500 on Friday, December 12, 2008:
> I did the first backup on a new machine but aborted it part way
> through because I had the excludes wrong. It was recorded as a partial
> level 0 backup.
>
> I then ran BackupPC_dump from the command line using '-i'
> (incremental) which completed without errors
> The partial backup was (appropriately) replaced by the new backup
> which was (appropriately) assigned Type=full (since there were no
> previous full backups).
>
> However, the first backup on my list now is:
>
> Backup# Type Filled Level
> 0 full yes 1
>
> This seems strange (at least at first glance) to have a "full" backup
> that is not level 0.
>
> Is this intentional? If so, what is the reasoning behind it?
>
> Thanks
>
Update... definitely seems like a bug because the next incremental
backup was also listed as a level 1 but now we have a level 1
incremental with no preceding lower level full backup...
Backup# Type Filled Level
0 full yes 1
1 incr no 1
This can't be right...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|