Amanda-Users

Re: taped DLEs

2009-09-11 13:42:51
Subject: Re: taped DLEs
From: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
To: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:26:06 -0400


Brian Cuttler wrote:
6 DLEs taped, 3 to the first tape and 4 to the second ?


SUMMARY          part      real  estimated
                           size       size
partition       :  17
estimated       :  17              1480735m
flush           :   0         0m
failed          :   0                    0m           (  0.00%)
wait for dumping:   7                  340m           (  0.02%)
dumping to tape :   0                    0m           (  0.00%)
dumping         :   4    373117m    556506m ( 67.05%) ( 25.20%)
dumped          :   6    968732m    923889m (104.85%) ( 65.42%)
wait for writing:   0         0m         0m (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
wait to flush   :   0         0m         0m (100.00%) (  0.00%)
writing to tape :   0         0m         0m (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
failed to tape  :   0         0m         0m (  0.00%) (  0.00%)
taped           :   6    968732m    923889m (104.85%) ( 65.42%)
  tape 1        :   3    826447m    782503m (102.94%) Cascade06 (4 chunks)
  tape 2        :   4    247635m    225507m ( 30.85%) Cascade07 (8 chunks)
8 dumpers idle  : runq
taper writing, tapeq: 0

flying wild guess -- the 3rd DLE was split? So is part on tape 1 and part on tape 2?


--
---------------

Chris Hoogendyk

-
  O__  ---- Systems Administrator
 c/ /'_ --- Biology & Geology Departments
(*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center
~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst
<hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>

---------------
Erdös 4



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>