Re: taped DLEs
2009-09-11 13:42:51
Brian Cuttler wrote:
6 DLEs taped, 3 to the first tape and 4 to the second ?
SUMMARY part real estimated
size size
partition : 17
estimated : 17 1480735m
flush : 0 0m
failed : 0 0m ( 0.00%)
wait for dumping: 7 340m ( 0.02%)
dumping to tape : 0 0m ( 0.00%)
dumping : 4 373117m 556506m ( 67.05%) ( 25.20%)
dumped : 6 968732m 923889m (104.85%) ( 65.42%)
wait for writing: 0 0m 0m ( 0.00%) ( 0.00%)
wait to flush : 0 0m 0m (100.00%) ( 0.00%)
writing to tape : 0 0m 0m ( 0.00%) ( 0.00%)
failed to tape : 0 0m 0m ( 0.00%) ( 0.00%)
taped : 6 968732m 923889m (104.85%) ( 65.42%)
tape 1 : 3 826447m 782503m (102.94%) Cascade06 (4 chunks)
tape 2 : 4 247635m 225507m ( 30.85%) Cascade07 (8 chunks)
8 dumpers idle : runq
taper writing, tapeq: 0
flying wild guess -- the 3rd DLE was split? So is part on tape 1 and
part on tape 2?
--
---------------
Chris Hoogendyk
-
O__ ---- Systems Administrator
c/ /'_ --- Biology & Geology Departments
(*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center
~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst
<hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
---------------
Erdös 4
|
|
|