Amanda-Users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: amstatus error on 2.6.1

2009-02-26 08:48:41
Subject: Re: amstatus error on 2.6.1
From: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
To: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:45:11 -0500 
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:49:21AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> stan wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:31:44AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> >  
> >>Stan,
> >>
> >>It's known bug, remove the line 1042.
> >>
> >>    
> >So, that element of the structure does not need to get aded to the
> >acumulation
> It's done a few line below.

Cool, thanks.
-- 
One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking
zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: amstatus error on 2.6.1, Jean-Louis Martineau
Next by Date:  Does anybody have client side encryption working on FreeBSD?, Oscar Ricardo Silva
Previous by Thread:  Re: amstatus error on 2.6.1, Jean-Louis Martineau
Next by Thread:  Does anybody have client side encryption working on FreeBSD?, Oscar Ricardo Silva
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]