Amanda-Users

Re: how large must the data volume be...

2008-11-20 04:02:19
Subject: Re: how large must the data volume be...
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert AT linux-m68k DOT org>
To: Olivier Nicole <on AT cs.ait.ac DOT th>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:15:28 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > ...so that tape drives become more cost-effective than storing
> > everything on HD's?
>  
> >From my past experience, 50GB SLR100 tape costs $100 while for that
> price I can have a 500GB disk...

Recently I asked our sysadmin at work how much an LTO tape (800 GB, i.e. 400 GB
native) costs, and I was quite surprised. I had expected O(100 EUR), but it was
much less.

But now let's start talking about the price of an autoloader... IIRC that's
something like 3000 EUR.

If you're a SOHO-user, you can probably get away with a few removable hard
drivers (and bring some of them offsite).

Pricewise, I guess you can get to the point were a bunch of HDs is still
cheaper than an autoloader with tapes, but it becomes more of a hassle to
manage your hard drives.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert AT linux-m68k 
DOT org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                                            -- Linus Torvalds

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>