|
Re: [Fwd: Re: strange planner problems]
2007-09-25 08:03:19
Ok in order to see what's going on I looked at my Cisco router's config
and I have noticed the order of the 'ip route' statements might indeed
lead to packets getting sent to the ADSL router first due to the placement
of the ip route statement identifying the default route (which is probably
redundant as there's already a default-router statement as well, but
that's Cisco stuff not directly Amanda-related).
To test this theory I've changed the ip route statements around so that
the one for the default route is last instead of first. It's never been a
problem before so I'm surprised I hadn't thought to re-order the routing
statements in the Cisco's config file before now. 8-)
Anyway I'll see if tonight's amdump run works and that will confirm that
the problem was with how the Cisco was forwarding the port 10080 packets.
Craig.
--
Post by Craig Dewick (tm). Web @ "http://lios.apana.org.au/~cdewick";.
Email 2 "cdewick AT lios.apana.org DOT au". SunShack @ "http://www.sunshack.org";
Galleries @ "http://www.sunshack.org/gallery2";. Also lots of tech data, etc.
Sun Microsystems webring at "http://n.webring.com/hub?ring=sunmicrosystemsu";.
|
|
|
