Amanda-Users

Re: first attempt with tape spanning...nogo.

2007-05-10 19:13:58
Subject: Re: first attempt with tape spanning...nogo.
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: AMANDA users <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:05:58 -0400
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:40:22PM -0400, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> My first attempt at using  tape spanning just failed.
> Anyone can offer some guidance?
> 
> Server is an sgi with 28 cpus 28G of ram and
> client is a debian Xeon quad-core with 4GB of ram.
> I've setup an amanda test config for a DLE of ~200GB
> supposed to be stuffed in 100GB LTO1 tapes. The dumptype
> for the DLE reads:
> 
> define dumptype tar-span {
>     global
>     program "GNUTAR"
>     priority high
>     auth "bsdtcp"
>     tape_splitsize 10 Gb
>     compress none
>     record no  
>     strategy noinc
>     fallback_splitsize 2 Gb
>     split_diskbuffer "/holddisk/conf9/split_diskbuffer"
>     comment "tape-spanning with tar"
> }
> 
> Makes sense or am I using crazy values? Not sure where
> split_diskbuffer lives: on the client or on the server?
> The amdump reports say:
> 


client
  |    via network
  V
server holding disk, possibly chunked
  |
  V
diskbuffer(s)
  split1, split2, ...   likely one filling, one already filled taping
  |
  V
tape

> NOTES:
>   planner: Adding new disk gaspar:concussion2-span.
>   taper: mmap failed (No such device or address): using fallback split size 
> of 2097152kb to buffer gaspar:concussion2-span.0 in-memory
>   driver: taper pid 13744170 exited with signal 6
> 

On my fedora system I had a problem with mmap.  It would not handle
buffers of the size I wanted, 2GB.  It did finally accept 1GB sized
split_diskbuffers.  For me, an OS thing, not an amanda thing.

jl
-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>