Re: Tape backup from server disk
2007-03-11 18:45:43
I probably should say that I'm not using VDISKS: the drive I'm backing
up to tape is on the server. There are no other backups running.
On 3/11/07, Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 05:42:15PM -0400, FL wrote:
> I'm using AMANDA to back up a disk that is periodically rsynced from
> a NAS. At a certain point in the backup, amdump complains that it doesn't
> have enough diskspace, persumably for the holding disk. Is this something I
> should be concerned about?
>
> Since the files are on a disk on the tapebackup server, I don't need a
> holding disk: I just want the tape backup to read the files from disk as
> they are needed; they don't need to be copied to a holding disk, as if the
> backups could be speeded up by sending them over a network to the server's
> holding disk.
>
> How do I ensure the desired behavior for this setup? Am I missing the point
> (no doubt I am, and no doubt it's the crucial point).
>
When using virtual tapes (disks) to store amanda dumps,
amanda still acts as if it were going to a physical tape
with a single data stream. The purpose of a holding disk
in this case is to allow multiple dumps run simultaneously
to the holding disk. As each completes it is transfered
to the vtape, a very fast operation. Thus the overall
time for backup should be shorter due to many running in
parallel to the holding disk rather than one a a time
going at dump rate (not disk to disk rate) directly to vtape.
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|
|
|