On Tuesday 14 November 2006 15:02, Frank Smith wrote:
>Gardiner Leverett wrote:
>> I'm having a similar problem someone reported earlier.
>> I have a subdirectory I'm tying to archive with gtar from
>> the client "arnold". It failed, so I subdivided it into
>> smaller pieces. For example, I have about 10 user directories,
>> so I have a config for the directories a-b, c-d, e-g, h-m, and n-z.
>>
>> Here's what I get:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>> FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
>>> arnold /z/workareas-eg lev 0 FAILED [mesg read: Connection reset by
>>
>> peer]
>>
>>> arnold /z/workareas-cd lev 0 FAILED [cannot read header: got 0
>>> instead
>>
>> of 32768]
>>
>>> arnold /z/workareas-ab lev 0 FAILED [cannot read header: got 0
>>> instead
>>
>> of 32768]
>>
>>> arnold /z/workareas-eg lev 0 FAILED [too many dumper retry]
>>> arnold /z/workareas-eg lev 0 FAILED [cannot read header: got 0
>>> instead
>>
>> of 32768]
>>
>>> arnold /z/workareas-cd lev 0 FAILED [too many dumper retry]
>>> arnold /z/workareas-cd lev 0 FAILED [cannot read header: got 0
>>> instead
>>
>> of 32768]
>>
>>> arnold /z/workareas-ab lev 0 FAILED [too many dumper retry]
>>> arnold /z/workareas-ab lev 0 FAILED [cannot read header: got 0
>>> instead
>>
>> of 32768]
>>
>> And in the dump summary, I get this:
>>> DUMP SUMMARY:
>>> arnold -rkareas-ab 0 FAILED
>>> arnold -rkareas-cd 0 FAILED
>>> arnold -rkareas-eg 0 N/A 242 -- N/A N/A N/A N/A
>>> PARTIAL arnold -rkareas-hm 0 242 32 13.3 25:58 158.9
>>> 0:0311598.7 arnold -rkareas-nz 0 106 22 21.1 10:58 164.6
>>> 0:0211269.6
>>>
>>> (brought to you by Amanda version 2.5.0b1-20051205)
>>
>> Any idea why I get two of the sub sections, partail of one, and
>> nothing from the
>> other two?
>
>What version of tar are you using? It might be related to what I
>saw in my recent posting, where tar 1.16 now returns an error code
>of 1 when a file changes during the run. Previous versions returned
>a 2 in that case, which I think just caused Amanda to flag it as
>STRANGE, but a 1 is interpreted as failed, so Amanda retries from the
>beginning until either it works or you hit 'too many dumper retries',
>whatever number that is. I haven't seen any replies on what 'PARTIAL'
>means.
>
>Frank
And one more time, tar eats our lunch. OTOH, note his amanda version
number, wasn't there problems with that one? ISTR it ate my lunch,
several times a few months ago.
--
Cheers, Gene
|
