Amanda-Users

Re: amverifyrun getting stuck

2006-10-31 15:29:11
Subject: Re: amverifyrun getting stuck
From: Dominik Schips <mail-lists AT s235 DOT de>
To: Steve Wray <steve.wray AT cwa.co DOT nz>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:40:24 +0100
Am Mittwoch, den 01.11.2006, 08:12 +1300 schrieb Steve Wray:
> Dominik Schips wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Am Dienstag, den 31.10.2006, 08:12 +1300 schrieb Steve Wray:
> >> Hi there,
> >> My amanda backup scripts do an amverifyrun after every run.
> >>
> >> One of our backup sets is on a tape changer.
> > 
> > Sorry for the questinon, but I also have a tape changer.
> > 
> > How do you do the amverifyrun after the backup if the backup used 2
> > tapes?
> 
> It never uses 2 tapes.

My backup run is using two tapes. That is why I ask.

> > Do you have a special script for this or is this possible with
> > amverifyrun by default?
> > How can I check my tapes after a backup?
> > 
> > I was thinking I can do this with a script grapping for the last used
> > tapes in the disklist file.
> > But if someone else know a better solution, please let me know.
> 
> amverifyrun is supposed to 'know' which tape was used last based on the
> log files.
> 
> Looking at the man page again though I have to say I am a little
> dubious. It seems awfuly lacking in clarity or, well, any information at
> all really.

Thank you for this fast reply and information. I'll have a closer look
about amverifyrun information in the next few days and do some more
tests if possible.

> > Thank you for every help.
> > 
> >> Recently, amverifyrun appears to have been getting 'stuck', verifying
> >> the same tape over and over again regardless of which tape was actually
> >> used in the last backup run.
> >>
> >> Most recently its become stuck on a tape which has not yet been used in
> >> amanda (labelled, never written to) resulting in some very amusing 
> >> output...
> >>
> >> Any suggestions on how to unstick it?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> > 
> > Best regards
> > 
> > Dominik Schips
> > 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>