Amanda-Users

RE: tapetype question

2006-08-02 13:13:26
Subject: RE: tapetype question
From: "McGraw, Robert P." <rmcgraw AT purdue DOT edu>
To: "Paul Bijnens" <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:05:33 -0400

_____________________________________________________________________
Robert P. McGraw, Jr.
Manager, Computer System                 EMAIL: rmcgraw AT purdue DOT edu
Purdue University                         ROOM: MATH-807
Department of Mathematics                PHONE: (765) 494-6055
150 N. University Street                   FAX: (419) 821-0540
West Lafayette, IN 47907-2067            


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Bijnens [mailto:paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:37 AM
> To: McGraw, Robert P.
> Cc: amanda List
> Subject: Re: tapetype question
> 
> 
> On 2006-08-02 15:08, McGraw, Robert P. wrote:
> > ./sbin/amtapetype -o -t LTO2HWC -e 200g -f /dev/rmt/1n
> >
> > Writing 2048 Mbyte   compresseable data:  38 sec
> > Writing 2048 Mbyte uncompresseable data:  76 sec
> > WARNING: Tape drive has hardware compression enabled
> > Estimated time to write 2 * 204800 Mbyte: 15200 sec = 4 h 13 min
> > wrote 6422528 32Kb blocks in 98 files in 7358 seconds (short write)
> > wrote 6455296 32Kb blocks in 197 files in 7737 seconds (short write)
> > define tapetype LTO2HWC {
> >     comment "just produced by tapetype prog (hardware compression on)"
> >     length 201216 mbytes
> >     filemark 0 kbytes
> >     speed 27315 kps
> > }
> >
> > I am in the process of trying to find out how to turn off hardware
> > compressing for the Solaris 10 OS.
> 
> 
> I hope you did understand that turning off hardware compression for
> LTO tape drives is not so important as for most other tape drives.
[McGraw, Robert P.] 
Yes I did. 
> 
> So why doing the effort, while you can use both hard- and software
> compression, and not suffer from the bad side effect (expanding data
> and loosing capacity) that most other tape drives have.
[McGraw, Robert P.] 
Inquiring minds want to know.

I have a request in to Sun support to try and find the answer.
> 
> As Joshua, I have hardware compression turned ON for my LTO2 drive,
> so that a few DLE's on slow hosts, where I cannot afford software
> compression, still benefit from the hardware compression and my
> tapes can hold more than 100% data now and then.
[McGraw, Robert P.] 

I am planning to leave it as is. I do not software compress at this time.

Why take up the CPU cycles to software compress your data if it is going to
be compressed on hardware?



Thanks

Robert




> 
> 
> --
> Paul Bijnens, xplanation Technology Services        Tel  +32 16 397.511
> Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM    Fax  +32 16 397.512
> http://www.xplanation.com/          email:  Paul.Bijnens AT xplanation DOT com
> ***********************************************************************
> * I think I've got the hang of it now:  exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, ^^, *
> * F6, quit, ZZ, :q, :q!, M-Z, ^X^C, logoff, logout, close, bye, /bye, *
> * stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt,  abort,  hangup, *
> * PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e,  kill -1 $$,  shutdown, *
> * init 0, kill -9 1, Alt-F4, Ctrl-Alt-Del, AltGr-NumLock, Stop-A, ... *
> * ...  "Are you sure?"  ...   YES   ...   Phew ...   I'm out          *
> ***********************************************************************

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>