Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option
2005-12-19 13:07:04
I think the essence is that while both are encryption, one is applied
to transport and one to storage. Thus, were we starting fresh I'd
recommend
transport_encryption
storage_encryption
Since we aren't, I think we should go with
encryption # transport, but holding disk and tapes are cleartext
server_storage_encryption # bits on tape are encrypted by server
client_storage_encryption # bits on tape are encrypted by client
This is wordy, and it blurs service and mechanism, but it will help
people to understand what they need.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, (continued)
Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Josef Wolf
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Kevin Till
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Greg Troxel
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Kevin Till
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option,
Greg Troxel <=
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Josef Wolf
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Greg Troxel
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Josef Wolf
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Greg Troxel
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Josef Wolf
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Jon LaBadie
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Josef Wolf
- Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Chris Lee
Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Greg Troxel
Re: new feature: client-side, server-side encryption dumptype option, Brian Cuttler
|
|
|