Montagni, Giovanni wrote:
I have changed our tape drive, because it started to fail to write on tape.
I have changed it with the same model.
After sostitution, amanda cannot recognise the tape, every day it give me error like
"Not an amanda tape", and i have to amrmtape then amlabel the tape again.
Is it possible to solve this problem?
First, can you read the tape with "dd"?
Try to read the label:
dd if=/dev/st0 bs=32k count=1
Is the label you see correct?
A frequent problem is blocksize difference.
I work in variable blocksize.
On linux:
mt -t /dev/st0 defblksize 0 # add this in /etc/rc.*/* somewhere
mt -t /dev/st0 setblk 0 # or this just before handling tape
If your tapes were written with a fixed blocksize, you should
use that value again (or relabel the tapes, and switch to variable
blocksize).
--
Paul Bijnens, Xplanation Tel +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM Fax +32 16 397.512
http://www.xplanation.com/ email: Paul.Bijnens AT xplanation DOT com
***********************************************************************
* I think I've got the hang of it now: exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, ^^, *
* F6, quit, ZZ, :q, :q!, M-Z, ^X^C, logoff, logout, close, bye, /bye, *
* stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt, abort, hangup, *
* PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e, kill -1 $$, shutdown, *
* init 0, kill -9 1, Alt-F4, Ctrl-Alt-Del, AltGr-NumLock, Stop-A, ... *
* ... "Are you sure?" ... YES ... Phew ... I'm out *
***********************************************************************
|