Amanda-Users

Re: Sockets?

2005-03-04 10:52:40
Subject: Re: Sockets?
From: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
To: erik AT epo DOT dk
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:42:50 +0100
Erik P. Olsen wrote:

I receive from the amdump processes a lot of "socket ignored" messages.
I assume this means that there is no indication on the dump media (in
casu tapes) of the ignored sockets. Then, what's the proceedure if one
has to recover a filesystem with sockets? Should I keep the messages so
that I could create the sockets manually?


You may ignore the messages.  I added them to the RE_NORMAL list
in client-src/sendbackup-gnutar.c .

It is the responsability of the program that want to listen to such
a socket to create it (using the socket(2) call).

(And how would you create those sockets manually, apart from running
the necessary program?)


--
Paul Bijnens, Xplanation                            Tel  +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM    Fax  +32 16 397.512
http://www.xplanation.com/          email:  Paul.Bijnens AT xplanation DOT com
***********************************************************************
* I think I've got the hang of it now:  exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, F6, *
* quit,  ZZ, :q, :q!,  M-Z, ^X^C,  logoff, logout, close, bye,  /bye, *
* stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt,  abort,  hangup, *
* PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e,  kill -1 $$,  shutdown, *
* kill -9 1,  Alt-F4,  Ctrl-Alt-Del,  AltGr-NumLock,  Stop-A,  ...    *
* ...  "Are you sure?"  ...   YES   ...   Phew ...   I'm out          *
***********************************************************************



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>