Amanda-Users

RE: Amanda security +Kerberos

2005-02-09 15:51:13
Subject: RE: Amanda security +Kerberos
From: "Gil Naveh" <gnaveh AT cleverex DOT com>
To: "Eric Dantan Rzewnicki" <rzewnickie AT rfa DOT org>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:43:51 -0500
Thanks for the help.

Unfortunately in my case, rsync won't work because I have to backup about 20
servers and I don't have the disk capacity for it.

Thx,
gil

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
[mailto:owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org]On Behalf Of Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 3:06 PM
To: Gil Naveh
Cc: Amanda-Users
Subject: Re: Amanda security +Kerberos


On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 02:13:57PM -0500, Gil Naveh wrote:
> hi,
> I am a little confused regarding adding security to Amanda.
> In the past I posted a question regarding adding security to Amanda -
> We have a Solaris 9 machine which is Amanda server and a remote Solaris 9
> machine which is Amanda client.
> We need the data that is transferring from the client to the server be
> secure.
> People have kindly answered my question but I am still confused.
> Some have suggested to use sftp or ssh - bring those files to the server
and
> then backing it up locally.
> However, by implementing this technique I am over loading the network -
> because I have to ssh or sftp all files daily instead of letting Amanda
get
> only the changes (level 0,1 etc). But is there a way to implement ssh/sftp
> with Amanda?

perhaps you could use rsync over ssh to pull only the changes.
--
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki  |  Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division  |  Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20036  |  202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network AT rfa DOT org.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>