Amanda-Users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: AMLABEL - might be a bug in amtapetype

2005-02-08 11:37:54
Subject: Re: AMLABEL - might be a bug in amtapetype
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:28:02 -0500 
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:02:29PM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> 
> All that said, when using an LTO drive, you may have hardware 
> compression enabled anyway, because the hw compr algorithm in those
> drives does not expand uncompressable data.

Maybe the amtapetype message should be revised to something like:

   hardware compression off (or drive uses a dynamic compression algorithm)

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: AMLABEL, Jon LaBadie
Next by Date:  Re: VXA-2 packet-loader issues and AMANDA [Fwd: hard luck with the new autoloader], Christoph Scheeder
Previous by Thread:  Re: AMLABEL - might be a bug in amtapetype, Paul Bijnens
Next by Thread:  Re: AMLABEL - might be a bug in amtapetype, Paul Bijnens
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]