Amanda-Users

Re: OT: which tape technology/drive to use

2005-01-05 04:39:23
Subject: Re: OT: which tape technology/drive to use
From: Martin Hepworth <martinh AT solid-state-logic DOT com>
To: Glenn English <ghe AT slsware DOT com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:28:20 +0000
I'd echo Glenn's comments about airflow / ambient temp.

I've had 3 DLTs (HP) die on me, all when in a non temp controlled rooms. Since we moved 2/3 into temp controlled environment I've had (touches wood) no problems with those.

--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300


Glenn English wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 18:48 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:


Is DLT a sensible choice at this day and age? Any caveats with above
drives, if any? Sorry for the dumb questions, but I have only very
limited experience with tape backups.


I'm not real experienced either. but I just went from DDS4 to DLT (VS160
from Quantum), and I like it a whole lot. The drive is expensive and the
tapes cost a fortune, but I had the same complaint about DDS longevity
you do, and from my research, I'm expecting DLT to be a significant
improvement.
The VS160 is also a whole lot faster. On my system, IDE disks (DMA,
idebus=66) couldn't stream it -- SCSI and SATA can.

One note: If you go with DLT anything like mine, be *sure* to keep a
decent airflow on it or it will get awfully hot.


**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.

**********************************************************************


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>