Amanda-Users

Re: level insensitivity for iso images

2005-01-04 12:46:17
Subject: Re: level insensitivity for iso images
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
To: Benjamin Lewis <bhlewis AT purdue DOT edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:20:44 -0500
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 08:01, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
>Gene,
>
>> I'm noting this in the email reports amanda sends me, where it
>> doesn't make any diff what the runlevel is, its backing up the
>> whole iso image for all levels.
>
>[...]
>
>> coyote  -sc/FC3/FC3-i386-SRPMS-disc1.iso  1    563    563   --   
>> 3:1 3005.2   2:3  3787.3
>
>[...]
>
>Am I interpreting this correctly: you have individual files listed
> in the disklist? If so, I'm not sure how else GNUtar could respond.
>  A level 1 backup of an individual file doesn't make much sense to
> me.
I did that at one point so I could add them one by one without 
spoiling the schedueling that badly, but I see your point and I'll 
reduce it to the directory itself.

>Reading between the lines of the incremental archive format
>description in the GNUtar info pages, it seems to me that the
>incremental options to GNUtar are likely to depend on having a
>directory entry in the tar file.
>
>I would expect that you might see small incrementals if you
> specified the FC3 directory in the disklist rather than the
> individual files themselves.
>
>-Ben

Thanks Ben, one more time the forest got in the way of seeing the 
trees... :-)

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.31% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>